Case 1402049/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Nagorskaite v Emmanuel Popat — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402049/2022
- Decision date
- 16 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge EJ Cadney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Nagorskaite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 23 June 2022 and the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The tribunal therefore decided that judgment could properly be entered under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that Emmanuel Popat had made unauthorised deductions from Miss K Nagorskaite's wages and ordered payment of £1,106.25 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £737.50.
The total sum ordered was £1,843.75. The judgment does not record any separate remedy breakdown beyond those two sums, and it does not mention any discrimination or dismissal claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,106 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £738 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,844
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.