Case 1402052/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr D Stewart - counsel — 2019
- Case reference
- 1402052/2018
- Decision date
- 24 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Appearances
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing, Employment Judge O’Rourke heard evidence from the claimant, including two disability impact statements, an agreed bundle, and medical records, to decide whether he was disabled at the material time within s.6 of the Equality Act 2010. The claimant relied on periods of low mood, anxiety, stress, sleep problems, reduced concentration, and an asserted impact from possible OCD. The respondent argued that the contemporaneous records did not support the level of impairment described in the statements.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant had experienced low mood and work-related stress, and that these may have amounted to an impairment, but it found that the evidence did not show a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities. It placed weight on the GP and occupational health records, which mainly recorded stress at work, low mood and anxiety, and noted that there was no diagnosis of depression during the relevant period. It also considered that the claimant’s more detailed accounts given after dismissal were not supported by the contemporaneous medical material.
In reaching its conclusion, the tribunal noted that the claimant was able during the relevant period to exercise, swim, attend and pass an intensive course, interact with colleagues, and carry out ordinary tasks, even if he struggled with aspects of his particular job. It found that the more serious symptoms described in the statements, including severe sleep deprivation, OCD and a near complete mental breakdown, were at best exaggerations of the symptoms recorded at the time. The disability discrimination claim was therefore struck out. The judgment recorded that the remaining unfair dismissal claim would proceed to hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | At a preliminary hearing on 12 April 2019, the tribunal found the claimant was not disabled within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time and struck out the disability discrimination claim. The remaining unfair dismissal claim was said to proceed to hearing. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- statutory Guidance on the Definition of Disability (2011)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.