Case 1402056/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Dawid Sadlo v Air Liquide Healthcare Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402056/2022
- Decision date
- 14 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Millard Date
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dawid Sadlo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard a preliminary issue in Dawid Sadlo v Air Liquide Healthcare Ltd at Bristol on 4 April 2023 before Employment Judge Millard. It dismissed the unfair dismissal claim and the automatic unfair dismissal claim because both were presented out of time, and the tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for them to have been presented in time.
The tribunal also dismissed the direct race discrimination claim and the indirect race discrimination claim. It found those claims were presented out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. The judgment records no remedy because the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the claims.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on a preliminary issue because it was presented out of time; the Tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal claim dismissed on a preliminary issue because it was presented out of time; the Tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination claim dismissed on a preliminary issue because it was presented out of time; the Tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Indirect race discrimination claim dismissed on a preliminary issue because it was presented out of time; the Tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.