Case 1402075/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Ujah v Department of Work and Pensions — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402075/2022
- Decision date
- 12 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Ujah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the claimant's application for interim relief under section 128(1)a(i) Employment Rights Act 1996. The application was refused.
The judgment records that the claim would be listed for a telephone case management hearing. It does not determine the substantive claims, and the reasons were given orally with written reasons only to be provided if requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The only matter adjudicated in this judgment was the claimant's application for interim relief under section 128(1)a(i) Employment Rights Act 1996, which was refused. The substantive claims were not determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 128(1)a(i) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.