Case 1402091/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Kelleher v Turner & Townsend Project Management Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402091/2021
- Decision date
- 18 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Kelleher
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 7 January 2022, before Employment Judge J Bax, Mr E Kelleher appeared in person and Turner & Townsend Project Management Limited was represented by Miss I Cernis. The written record states that the reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal dismissed Mr Kelleher's claims for unlawful deductions from wages, accrued but untaken holiday, and breach of contract. It also recorded that the respondent succeeded on its employer's contract claim, and Mr Kelleher was ordered to pay the respondent £1,517.09.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deductions from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claimant's breach of contract claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Respondent's employer's contract claim; the claimant was ordered to pay £1,517.09. | Upheld | — | £1,517 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,517
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.