Case 1402105/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Jeremy Beck v LW&P (Holdings) Limited (in compulsory liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402105/2022
- Decision date
- 14 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Millard Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Jeremy Beck
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Bristol before Employment Judge Millard, upheld Mr Jeremy Beck's breach of contract claim against LW&P (Holdings) Limited. It found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's out of pocket expenses incurred on the respondent's business and ordered payment of £1,835.26 as damages for breach of contract.
The tribunal also upheld Mr Beck's unlawful deduction from wages claim. It found that the respondent had failed to pay his salary for 1 to 14 March 2022 and ordered payment of £5,833.33 gross. The written judgment records no separate apportionment of any broader award beyond these two sums.
The total monetary sum reflected in the judgment is £7,668.59, made up of the breach of contract damages and the gross wage deduction award. The judgment was sent to the parties on 14 April 2023, and it records that reasons had been given orally at the hearing so written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached contract by failing to pay the claimant's out of pocket expenses incurred on the respondent's business. | Upheld | — | £1,835 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages in respect of unpaid salary for 1 to 14 March 2022; the award was stated to be gross. | Upheld | — | £5,833 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,669
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.