Case 1402110/2022 · Employment Tribunal
William Storf v John Mark Webster and 2 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402110/2022
- Decision date
- 28 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M. Salter JUDGMENT
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
4 namedClaimant
William Storf
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Bristol hearing on 18 November 2022, before Employment Judge M. Salter, the First and Second Respondents did not dispute liability and the Third Respondent did not enter a response. The tribunal read the claimant's bundle and no party provided submissions. It then quantified the claims on the papers.
The tribunal ordered the Third Respondent, Newquay News Ltd, to pay William Storf a basic award of £2,023.35 and a compensatory award of £3,006.85 for unfair dismissal. The compensatory award was made up of £2,409.85 for losses to the date of the tribunal, £247.00 for 26 weeks' future loss, and £350.00 for loss of statutory rights.
It also awarded £1,248.40 for accrued but untaken holiday and £385.40 for failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions of employment. Separately, the tribunal held the Respondents jointly and severally liable for £1,252.55 for failure to inform and consult about the relevant transfer to the Third Respondent.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal awarded a basic award of £2,023.35 and a compensatory award of £3,006.85, comprising losses to date of £2,409.85, future loss for 26 weeks of £247.00, and loss of statutory rights of £350.00. | Upheld | — | £5,030 |
| Holiday pay | Award for accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £1,248 |
| Other | Compensation for failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions of employment. | Upheld | — | £385 |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The Respondents were held jointly and severally liable for failure to inform and consult about the relevant transfer to the Third Respondent. | Upheld | — | £1,253 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,917
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,023
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £3,007
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.