Case 1402111/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Czerwinska v Fitzroy Lodge Care Home — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402111/2022
- Decision date
- 15 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Czerwinska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Dawson found that Fitzroy Lodge Care Home had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss B Czerwinska's wages. The tribunal also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy, and that the respondent had failed to pay her holiday entitlement.
The tribunal further held that the unfair dismissal claim succeeded. No detailed reasons are set out in the extracted text, but the judgment records the substantive outcomes on liability for wages, redundancy, holiday entitlement, and unfair dismissal.
The tribunal did not determine remedy in this judgment. It recorded that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be decided at a separate Remedy Hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy. This is mapped to the redundancy category in the listing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim of unfair dismissal succeeded. Remedy was deferred to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.