Case 1402152/2022 · Employment Tribunal
NICHOLAS CHAPMAN v EDF Energy plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402152/2022
- Decision date
- 15 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Oldroyd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
NICHOLAS CHAPMAN
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNicholas Chapman brought claims against EDF Energy Limited for unfair dismissal and breach of contract. The case was heard at Exeter by VHS on 7 and 8 November 2022 before Employment Judge Oldroyd sitting alone; the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Willoughby of counsel.
The written judgment records that the claims for unfair dismissal and breach of contract are dismissed. It records no monetary award or other remedy. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless a written request was received within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing but does not set out the factual reasoning. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The written judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing but does not set out the factual reasoning. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.