Case 1402153/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mrs. J Rowse (2) Mr. N Mallett v HDH Plymouth Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402153/2022
- Decision date
- 3 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mrs. J Rowse (2) Mr. N Mallett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claims were issued in the Exeter Employment Tribunals on 5 July 2022 and 18 July 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge Livesey determined the case under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that both claimants were dismissed by reason of redundancy and were entitled to redundancy payments. Mr. N Mallett was awarded £2,987.75 and Mrs. J Rowse was awarded £969.50.
The listed hearing on 18 November 2022 was cancelled. The judgment records no other claims, liability issues, or separate remedy components beyond the redundancy payments awarded to each claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Claim by Mr. N Mallett; determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £2,988 |
| Redundancy | Claim by Mrs. J Rowse; determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £970 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,957
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.