Case 1402167/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Williamson v McCarthy & Stone Retirement Lifestyles Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402167/2021
- Decision date
- 16 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Williamson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Southampton on 11 February 2022, Employment Judge Rayner found that Mrs A Williamson had been unfairly dismissed by the respondent, McCarthy & Stone Retirement Lifestyles Limited, by reason of an unfair selection for redundancy. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms R Little, HR Manager, observing only.
The judgment records compensation for 13 weeks' net loss of earnings in the sum of £6,224.40 and £500.00 for loss of statutory rights. It then states that the total amount of compensation payable to the claimant was £6,875.62.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that Mrs A Williamson was unfairly dismissed by reason of an unfair selection for redundancy. The judgment records compensation of £6,224.40 for 13 weeks' net loss of earnings and £500.00 for loss of statutory rights, and states that the total amount payable was £6,875.62. | Upheld | — | £6,876 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,876
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £6,724
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.