Case 1402187/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Big City Services Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402187/2021
- Decision date
- 6 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case remotely on 3 September 2021. The claimant, Mr Arron Clarke, appeared in person. The respondent, Big City Services Limited, did not attend, no appearance was entered, and no valid response had been presented. The judgment was therefore entered under Rule 21.
The tribunal upheld three heads of claim. It found that the claimant was entitled to one week’s notice pay of £741.20 on the breach of contract claim. It also upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim and awarded £2,806.55 gross, described as three weeks’ wages of £2,223.60 plus NEST pension deductions of £582.95. The tribunal further upheld the claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay and awarded £889.44 for six days’ pay. The total award was £4,437.19.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | One week’s notice pay awarded under the breach of contract claim. | Upheld | — | £741 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award described as the gross sum of £2,806.55, made up of £2,223.60 in three weeks’ wages and £582.95 in NEST pension deductions. | Upheld | — | £2,807 |
| Holiday pay | Award for six days’ accrued but unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £889 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,437
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.