Case 1402197/2022 · Employment Tribunal
MR L OTTLEY v Solent Blue Line Ltd T/a Bluestar — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402197/2022
- Decision date
- 12 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR L OTTLEY
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 18 August 2022, the Tribunal gave Mr L Ottley an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the complaint of unfair constructive dismissal should not be struck out on the basis that he did not have the necessary two years' service to bring the claim. The claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the complaint of constructive unfair dismissal. The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claims were listed for hearing on 30 and 31 August 2023, subject to compliance with the terms of the unless order contained in the case management order dated 28 March 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was struck out after the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on the issue of insufficient service. The claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.