Case 1402198/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v In-Depth Utilities Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402198/2020
- Decision date
- 22 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goraj Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 17 September 2020, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out. The stated grounds were non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 17 July 2020 and that the claims had not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying claim and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment covers case numbers 1402198/2020, 1402199/2020 and 1402200/2020 together. It does not specify the underlying substantive cause of action, so the claim type is recorded as other. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37
- non-compliance with Tribunal order
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.