Case 1402207/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Jones v Glatfelter Lydney Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402207/2022
- Decision date
- 19 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 21 September 2022, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records that the hearing fixed for 28 March 2022 would not take place. No substantive findings on liability or remedy are set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment does not list the substantive pleaded allegations, but the case was indexed as including age discrimination and the tribunal struck out 'the claim' for failure to pursue it. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not list the substantive pleaded allegations, but the case was indexed as including breach of contract and the tribunal struck out 'the claim' for failure to pursue it. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not list the substantive pleaded allegations, but the case was indexed as including unfair dismissal and the tribunal struck out 'the claim' for failure to pursue it. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.