Mr D Kindon v Travis Perkins plc — 2022

Case reference: 1402230/2021
Decision date: 19 July 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Hughes Representation

Indexed: 20 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr D Kindon

Respondent

Travis Perkins plc

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claimant withdrew his claim in respect of discrimination, and the tribunal dismissed that claim on withdrawal. The judgment does not identify the protected characteristic or any further details of that claim.

The tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim had been presented outside the time limit in s111(2)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It also found that it had been reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the claim within that period, so the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed as outside the tribunal's jurisdiction.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment describes this only as a claim in respect of discrimination and says it was dismissed on withdrawal; no protected characteristic is identified.	Withdrawn	—	—
Unfair dismissal	The claim was presented outside the time period in s111(2)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present it in time and dismissed it as outside jurisdiction.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.