Case 1402231/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Belton v Swan Hospitality Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402231/2020
- Decision date
- 1 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Belton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment, issued under Rule 21, states that Mr A Belton was dismissed by Swan Hospitality Ltd in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £1,846.12 for that claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,846.12. No further reasons are set out in the extracted text, and no other claims are recorded.
The monetary awards stated in the judgment total £3,692.24. The extracted text does not identify any separate basic award, compensatory award, interest, or other remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,846.12. | Upheld | — | £1,846 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,846.12. | Upheld | — | £1,846 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,692
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.