Case 1402233/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr James Dalton v Sapphire Vehicle Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402233/2020
- Decision date
- 8 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr James Dalton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed Mr Dalton's complaint of automatically unfair dismissal under section 100 Employment Rights Act 1996. The written record gives the outcome only and records that the decision was given orally at the hearing, with written reasons not provided unless requested.
The tribunal upheld the complaint under Regulation 13 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 in respect of annual holiday pay. The judgment states that this issue had been conceded by the respondent and that compensation had been paid, so no separate monetary award is recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Complaint of automatically unfair dismissal under section 100 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Complaint under Regulation 13 Working Time Regulations 1998 in respect of annual holiday pay; the respondent conceded the claim and compensation was paid. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 100 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 13 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.