Case 1402238/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Miss E Francis v JVN Global Ltd — 2021

Case reference: 1402238/2020
Decision date: 7 January 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Livesey

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss E Francis

Respondent

JVN Global Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

In this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Livesey found that Miss E Francis had been the subject of an unauthorised deduction from wages by JVN Global Ltd. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay her £135.85 gross in respect of that claim.

The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £554.94 for that failure.

On the dismissal claim, the tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. It awarded a basic award of £5,607 and a compensatory award of £6,850.49.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £135.85.	Upheld	—	£136
Holiday pay	The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £554.94.	Upheld	—	£555
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded a basic award of £5,607 and a compensatory award of £6,850.49.	Upheld	—	£12,457

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £13,148; across all upheld claims
Basic award: £5,607; statutory, unfair dismissal
Compensatory award: £6,850; compensatory remedy recorded

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.