Case 1402284/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Rhoads v Testerworld Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402284/2022
- Decision date
- 31 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Rhoads
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent had not presented a response, and the administrators had consented to the claims continuing. On the available material, the tribunal found that as at 9 May 2022 the respondent was proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within 90 days at the Bilton Road, Basingstoke depot/site, and that the claimant was one of the affected employees and was dismissed as redundant on that date.
The tribunal found that the respondent was required under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 to consult appropriate representatives and provide the statutory written information. It found that there was no recognised independent trade union for the claimant's description of employee, no existing authorised employee representatives, and no representatives elected for section 188 purposes because the respondent did not invite affected employees to elect them.
The tribunal held that the respondent failed to comply with section 188, that no special circumstances had been shown, and that the complaint was presented in time. It made a protective award under section 189 for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 9 May 2022, having found no consultation at all and no mitigating circumstances. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed, having been withdrawn by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A(1) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.