Case 1402285/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Walicka Mr J Marks-Crockett v Testerworld Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402285/2022
- Decision date
- 31 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Walicka Mr J Marks-Crockett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal entered a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent had not presented a response and the judge considered the complaints could properly be determined on the available material. The respondent company's administrators had consented to the claims continuing.
The Tribunal found that as at 9 May 2022 the respondent was proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within 90 days or less at the Bilton Road, Basingstoke depot/site. The claimants were employees who may have been affected by the proposed dismissals and were dismissed as redundant on 30 June 2022.
The Tribunal found that there was no recognised independent trade union, no existing employee representatives with authority to be consulted, and no representatives elected for section 188 purposes because the respondent did not invite affected employees to elect them. The respondent failed to comply with section 188, had not shown special circumstances making compliance not reasonably practicable, and there had been no consultation at all with no mitigating circumstances. A protective award was made for the maximum protected period of 90 days for each claimant. The unfair dismissal claims were dismissed after withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements. The award was 90 days' remuneration for each claimant, with no monetary amount stated. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the unfair dismissal claims were dismissed, having been withdrawn by the claimants. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.