Case 1402287/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Chivers v Testerworld Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1402287/2022
- Decision date
- 26 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Chivers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Newcastle by video on 24-26 July 2024 before Employment Judge Aspden. The claimant, Mr Chivers, was not in attendance and was not represented; the respondent and the Secretary of State were also not in attendance.
The judgment states that, because the claimant failed to attend the hearing, the claimant's claim was dismissed pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The decision does not record any determination of the merits of the underlying complaints.
No remedy was awarded and no separate findings on liability, compensation, or individual heads of claim are set out in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claimant failed to attend the hearing and that the claim was dismissed pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It does not set out separate substantive findings on the underlying claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.