Case 1402315/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Bogun v J and G Environmental Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402315/2022
- Decision date
- 7 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mr Richardson, Ms Sinclair
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Bogun
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Southampton on 10 to 13 October 2023 found that Mr D Bogun was unfairly dismissed by J and G Environmental Ltd. On that claim it ordered a basic award of £6,528 and a compensatory award of £692.70.
The tribunal also found that the respondent discriminated against Mr Bogun because of something arising from his disability. It awarded £6,000 for injury to feelings and £608.87 interest on that award.
The judgment states that the remaining claims were dismissed. The total monetary award was £13,829.57, and the record notes that the recoupment provisions do not apply. The written record also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal ordered a basic award of £6,528 and a compensatory award of £692.70 on the unfair dismissal claim. | Upheld | — | £7,221 |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found discrimination because of something arising from disability and awarded £6,000 for injury to feelings plus £608.87 interest. | Upheld | Disability | £6,609 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the remaining claims were dismissed; the extracted text does not specify this claim separately in the operative paragraphs, but the case listing includes unlawful deduction from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,830
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £6,528
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £693
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.