Case 1402353/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Chipchase v Richard Chalker T/a Platinum Build & Others — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402353/2020
- Decision date
- 16 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Chipchase
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the Employment Tribunal determined the claimant's claims without a hearing. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,400 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £400 damages.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to provide itemised pay statements and ordered £1,000, failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered £510, and failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars and ordered £2,000. The judgment records that the total sum payable by the respondent to the claimant was £5,310.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,400 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £400 |
| Other | Failure to provide itemised pay statements. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £510 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,310
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.