Case 1402364/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Priya Cunningham (Consultant) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402364/2020
- Decision date
- 13 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting by video on 12 May 2021, recorded a single judgment: Mr G Stevenson was a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at times material to the claim, by reason of epilepsy. The respondent was South West Intervention Services, and the claimant appeared in person; the respondent was represented by Priya Cunningham, Consultant.
This written record does not set out any further substantive liability findings, dismissal of claims, or remedy award. It is a short judgment dealing only with the disability-status issue, with oral reasons given at the hearing and no written reasons to follow unless requested within 14 days. The hearing was held in public by video because of COVID-19 restrictions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary issue: the tribunal found that the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at times material to the claim, by reason of epilepsy. The written record does not record any substantive discrimination or wage outcome. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.