Case 1402364/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Aaron Wiggan v Moon River Lodge Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402364/2021
- Decision date
- 5 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Representation
- Venue
- Bristol ET via VHS
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Aaron Wiggan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Aaron Wiggan, brought a claim against Moon River Lodge Ltd in the Bristol Employment Tribunal. The written judgment records a single successful claim for unpaid holiday pay.
The tribunal held that the claim in respect of unpaid holiday pay was well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £862.40, subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance. No further reasons were set out in the written record because the reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
No other claims, legal tests, or remedy components are recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the Claimant's claim in respect of unpaid holiday pay was well founded and ordered payment of £862.40, subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £862 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £862
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.