Case 1402373/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Charlotte Anderson v AND Custom House Plymouth Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402373/2021
- Decision date
- 14 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Charlotte Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claim under rule 21 after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been filed. Miss Charlotte Anderson brought claims against Custom House Plymouth Limited for breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages, and accrued but unpaid holiday pay.
The breach of contract claim succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay 24 hours' notice pay in the net sum of £240.00. The unlawful deduction from wages claim also succeeded. The judgment recorded 121.5 hours at £10.00 per hour and a one-off agreed payment of £1,000.00, giving a subtotal of £2,215.00, from which the claimant was given credit of £440.88 already received, leaving £1,774.12 gross due.
The claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeded as well. The tribunal ordered payment for 96 hours' holiday pay in the gross sum of £960.00. The total sum ordered against the respondent was £2,974.12.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim succeeded on 24 hours' notice pay, ordered in the net sum of £240.00. | Upheld | — | £240 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim succeeded for 121.5 hours at £10.00 per hour plus a one-off agreed payment of £1,000.00, giving a subtotal of £2,215.00. The claimant was given credit for £440.88 already received, leaving £1,774.12 gross payable. | Upheld | — | £1,774 |
| Holiday pay | Claim succeeded for 96 hours' accrued but unpaid holiday pay, ordered in the gross sum of £960.00. | Upheld | — | £960 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,974
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.