Case 1402377/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Graham Roberts and Rebecca Roberts v Automotive Online Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402377/2021
- Decision date
- 4 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hay Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Graham Roberts and Rebecca Roberts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a liability-only judgment heard remotely on 21 June 2022 before Employment Judge Hay. The tribunal held that the first and second claimants' claims of unauthorized deduction from wages were well founded, which meant the respondent had made unlawful deductions of wages from both claimants.
No monetary figures were assessed at this stage. The judgment records that the sums owed to the claimants would be determined at a later remedy hearing, and that the parties would be notified of a date and receive a separate case management order for preparation. No further factual reasoning or legal test was set out in the written record provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claims of unauthorized deduction from wages brought by the first and second claimant were well founded. It also says the sums owed were to be determined at a later remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.