Case 1402378/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person, assisted by his partner Ms Buckingham For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402378/2021
- Decision date
- 21 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person, assisted by his partner Ms Buckingham For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing limited to whether Mr Charlick was a disabled person for Equality Act purposes during the material period of his employment, from 2 March 2020 to 3 February 2021. The tribunal accepted evidence from Mr Charlick and Ms Buckingham, together with GP records and an occupational health report, that he had experienced anxiety and depression since childhood, notwithstanding a period of substance addiction in earlier years.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal determined the claimant was a disabled person by reason of anxiety/depression from 2 March 2020 to 3 February 2021. It did not determine the merits of the Equality Act claims at this stage. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Equality Act 2010 section 6
- Equality Act 2010 Schedule 1
- Equality Act 2010 (Disability) Regulations 2010 regulation 3
- Equality Act 2010 section 136
- Richmond Adult Community College v McDougall [2008] IRLR 227
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.