Case 1402381/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402381/2019
- Decision date
- 2 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only matter recorded in the judgment was the claimant's claim for detriment arising from protected public interest disclosures. The tribunal heard the case by phone in Plymouth on 2 January 2020 before Employment Judge Roper, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr Macmillan of Counsel.
The judgment states that the claimant's whistleblowing detriment claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. No substantive findings on liability are set out, and the judgment does not record any tribunal determination on the merits of the allegation.
No monetary award is recorded. The judgment is limited to the withdrawal-based dismissal and does not contain any separate remedy assessment, legal test, or additional findings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the claimant's claim for detriment arising from protected public interest disclosures was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.