Case 1402398/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Williams v St Mungo’s Community Housing Association — 2019
- Case reference
- 1402398/2019
- Decision date
- 10 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harper MBE
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment in which Employment Judge Harper MBE recorded that the claimant, Mr D Williams, had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 11 June 2019 and had not actively pursued the claim. By a letter dated 18 November 2019, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. The hearing listed for 7 to 8 January 2020 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant did not comply with the tribunal's order dated 11 June 2019 and had not actively pursued the case. The tribunal noted that the claimant had been given an opportunity by letter dated 18 November 2019 to make representations or request a hearing, but did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.