Case 1402398/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Tuff v Restaurant 21 Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402398/2021
- Decision date
- 27 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Tuff
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 29 November 2021, Employment Judge Livesey notified the claimant that strike out was being considered because he had not complied with the tribunal order of 12 November 2021 and the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was directed to provide any objection in writing, or request an oral hearing, by 13 December 2021.
No response was received by that deadline. The judgment therefore states that the claimant's claim was struck out. The decision is procedural only and records no substantive findings on the merits of any underlying employment claim.
The judgment is brief and does not identify any lay members, legal test, or monetary award. It is dated 27 January 2022 and was sent to the parties the same day.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that 'the claimant's claim is struck out' because the claimant did not comply with the order dated 12 November 2021 and the claim had not been actively pursued. The underlying substantive claim type is not specified in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.