Case 1402403/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Piestrzynski v Gelato Amore Mio Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402403/2022
- Decision date
- 23 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Piestrzynski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol Employment Tribunal by video hearing on 12 January 2023 before Employment Judge Self, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by a consultant. The sole judgmented issue was the claimant's complaint that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from wages.
The tribunal held that the claim was well-founded and succeeded. It ordered the respondent, Gelato Amore Mio Limited, to pay the claimant £489.20, subject to tax and national insurance deductions. No other claims, findings, or remedy components are recorded in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's claim for unlawful deductions from wages well-founded and ordered payment of £489.20 less tax and national insurance deductions. | Upheld | — | £489 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £489
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.