Case 1402407/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Page v Devon Pubs Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402407/2020
- Decision date
- 14 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Matthews Representation
- Venue
- Plymouth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Page
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response and did not attend the hearing before Employment Judge Matthews at Plymouth on 11 September 2020. The tribunal therefore determined the claim on the evidence available and found that the claimant's claim under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for unpaid wages was well founded.
The schedule of calculations records that the claimant had not been paid for March 2020 and three weeks of April 2020. It also records that the claimant was dismissed with effect from 25 April 2020 and that, for the three weeks in April 2020, she agreed to accept 80% of her pay as part of a furlough arrangement. On that basis the tribunal calculated £1,500 due for wages, less £1,250 already paid, leaving £250 outstanding.
The tribunal also found that the claimant's claim under regulation 30(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for holiday pay under regulation 14(2) was well founded. The schedule of calculations states that 43 hours' holiday pay were owed, calculated at 35 hours at the normal hourly rate of £9 and 8 hours at the furlough rate of £7.20, producing £372.60.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £622.60 in total. The judgment states that any lawful deduction for income tax, national insurance contributions or otherwise would count towards satisfaction of the order, and that in the absence of evidence to substantiate the lawfulness of a deduction the gross amount would be due.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the wages claim well founded under section 23 ERA 1996. The claimant had not been paid for March and three weeks of April 2020, subject to a furlough arrangement at 80% pay for the three weeks in April. The schedule of calculations recorded £1,500 due, less £1,250 already paid, leaving £250 outstanding. | Upheld | — | £250 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found the holiday pay claim well founded under regulation 30(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, with the entitlement arising under regulation 14(2). The schedule of calculations recorded 43 hours' holiday pay due, calculated as 35 hours at £9 and 8 hours at £7.20, totalling £372.60. | Upheld | — | £373 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £623
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 30(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.