Case 1402410/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Bevan v Devon Pubs Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402410/2020
- Decision date
- 14 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Matthews Representation
- Venue
- Plymouth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Bevan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs M Bevan brought a claim under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 alleging that Devon Pubs Ltd had failed to pay wages due. The tribunal found the claim well founded. The judgment records that the respondent did not present a response and did not attend the hearing on 11 September 2020.
In the schedule of calculations, the tribunal found that the claimant had not been paid from and including March 2020 to the end of June 2020, when she found other work. It also recorded that, for April to June 2020, the claimant had agreed to accept 80% of her pay as a furlough arrangement. The tribunal calculated pay for March at £624 and pay for April to June 2020 at £1,497.60, with a week’s pay in hand of £144, producing a gross figure of £2,265.60.
From that sum, the tribunal deducted £1,250 said to have already been paid on account of wages, leaving £1,015.60 due to the claimant. The respondent was ordered to pay that amount, subject to any lawful deductions for tax, national insurance, or otherwise.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim brought under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for wages said to be unpaid from March 2020 to the end of June 2020. The tribunal found the claim well founded and ordered payment of the balance after deducting sums already paid on account. | Upheld | — | £1,016 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,016
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.