Case 1402411/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Hussain v HM Revenue and Customs — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402411/2021
- Decision date
- 31 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claims identified in specified paragraphs of the Case Summary dated 3 August 2022 were dismissed as an abuse of process. The dismissed matters were paragraph 2.1.1 and paragraph 2.1.5 insofar as they concerned the period before 23 July 2019, paragraph 2.1.2, and paragraph 2.1.8.1 insofar as it concerned the period before 23 July 2019.
The judgment does not set out the underlying factual allegations, the legal labels attached to those paragraph numbers, or any remedy. It states that the reasons were given in the Case Summary of the same date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment dismisses specified claims identified only by paragraph numbers in the Case Summary of 3 August 2022, without setting out their legal labels in the judgment text. The gov.uk listing indicates age, disability, race, and religion or belief discrimination categories, but the judgment itself does not identify which paragraph numbers correspond to which claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- abuse of process
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.