Case 1402422/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Lynham v Hampton Printing (Bristol) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402422/2019
- Decision date
- 8 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Lynham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 8 April 2020, before Employment Judge J Bax sitting at Bristol, the Claimant was represented by Mr Nicholls and the Respondent by Ms Gardiner. The tribunal recorded that the hearing was conducted remotely by audio and that a face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable.
The only claims recorded in the judgment were age discrimination and disability discrimination. The tribunal stated that both claims were dismissed upon their withdrawal by the Claimant. No merits findings were made on either claim.
The judgment does not record any remedy award, and there is no indication of any liability findings beyond the dismissal following withdrawal. The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment records that the age discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the disability discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.