Case 1402423/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Duran Delgado v Pizzeria Gali Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1402423/2024
- Decision date
- 6 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Yallop Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Duran Delgado
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for Pizzeria Gali Ltd as a kitchen supervisor from 23 October 2023 until his resignation on 6 July 2024. The respondent did not attend the 27 June 2025 hearing. The tribunal considered rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, noted that the respondent had been aware of the proceedings and had stopped corresponding, and decided to proceed in its absence.
On wages, the respondent admitted that sums shown on payslips for 15 June, 29 June and 13 July 2024 were owed but had not been paid. The tribunal found a well-founded complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages and awarded the outstanding gross balance of £3,332.72 after crediting £200 already received.
On holiday pay, the respondent accepted that accrued but untaken holiday was due on termination but disputed the calculation. The tribunal found that, because no leave year was set out in writing, the leave year ran from 23 October 2023 to 22 October 2024 under regulations 13(3) and 13A(4) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It accepted the claimant's evidence that he worked a regular 46-hour week at £13 per hour, treated that as £598 gross weekly pay under regulation 16(3ZA), calculated 3.98 weeks of accrued leave by the termination date, and awarded £2,380.04 under regulations 14(2) and 16(1).
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent admitted the arrears. The tribunal awarded the outstanding gross balance after crediting £200 already received. | Upheld | — | £3,333 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent accepted that accrued but untaken holiday was due but disputed the calculation. The tribunal applied the Working Time Regulations 1998 to fix the leave year and compute the amount due. | Upheld | — | £2,380 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,713
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- rule 47 Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024
- regulations 13(3) and 13A(4) Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 16(3ZA) Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulations 14(2) and 16(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.