Case 1402427/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Charles Usher v AND Pocketfit LLP and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 1402427/2019
- Decision date
- 21 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr Charles Usher
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 on 21 August 2019 at Plymouth after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. The hearing listed for 6 September 2019 was cancelled.
The Claimant's claims against the second and third Respondents were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type for those withdrawn claims in the extracted text.
The Claimant's claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded against the first Respondent. The tribunal ordered the first Respondent to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £4,608.80.
To the extent that the Claimant brought a claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay, that claim was dismissed because the Claimant was unable to provide particulars.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the first Respondent to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £4,608.80. | Upheld | — | £4,609 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal dismissed the claim to the extent it was for accrued but unpaid holiday pay because the Claimant was unable to provide particulars. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The Claimant's claims against the second and third Respondents were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant; the underlying claim type is not specified in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,609
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.