Case 1402435/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Sudlow v Airband Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402435/2022
- Decision date
- 3 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Sudlow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 11 October 2022, the tribunal gave Ms L Sudlow an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success and/or the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records that the hearing listed for 20 December 2022 would not take place. No substantive liability findings or monetary remedy were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim(s) after a letter dated 11 October 2022 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claims should not be struck out because they had no reasonable prospect of success and/or the tribunal had no jurisdiction. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.