Case 1402436/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Honey v Roadlink Logistics Ltd and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 1402436/2019
- Decision date
- 25 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R. Harper MBE
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr M Honey
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claimant's claim under rule 37. It recorded that, by email dated 31 October 2019, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations and warned that in default of a reply there was a risk the claim would be struck out.
No representations were received from the claimant. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim.
The Tribunal also recorded that the hearing listed for 10 January 2020 would not take place. The judgment was signed by Employment Judge R. Harper MBE on 19 November 2019 and sent to the parties on 25 November 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant did not respond to the Tribunal's email of 31 October 2019. The judgment text does not specify the substantive claim type; the public listing describes the case as unlawful deduction from wages. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.