Case 1402436/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Kozlecka v Steven Wheeler T/A TDH Diner — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402436/2022
- Decision date
- 19 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Kozlecka
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss P Kozlecka presented a claim against Steven Wheeler T/A TDH Diner. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge dealt with the case under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the material before the tribunal, the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The tribunal therefore upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim and ordered the respondent to pay £2,204.00 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. That claim was upheld and the respondent was ordered to pay £917.42.
The judgment records a total award of £3,121.42. The hearing listed for 11 August 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal stated that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,204.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,204 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal stated that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £917.42. | Upheld | — | £917 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,121
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.