Case 1402440/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Avery v Stone Trading International Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402440/2020
- Decision date
- 12 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Avery
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 and found that Mr D Avery had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered Stone Trading International Ltd to pay damages of £2,700.00 gross for that breach.
The tribunal also found that Mr Avery was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. The respondent was ordered to pay redundancy pay of £2,925.00 gross. The combined monetary outcome recorded in the judgment is £5,625.00 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and was awarded damages of £2,700.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,700 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,925.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,925 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,625
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.