Case 1402470/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Charman v Stark Building Materials UK Ltd (Trading as ‘Jewson’) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1402470/2024
- Decision date
- 20 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Charman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 6 February 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the complaints of sex discrimination and discrimination based on religion or belief should not be struck out. The issue arose because the claimant had not sufficiently complied with the tribunal's direction of 6 February 2025 requiring him to confirm which of proposals a-d were being pursued as legal claims.
A further opportunity was given on 18 March 2025, but no reply was received. The tribunal said those claims could not sensibly be responded to by the respondent and that the claimant had failed to make sufficiently clear written representations or request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the complaints of sex discrimination and discrimination based on religion or belief. The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claim(s) remained listed for hearing on 7 July 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal struck out the complaint after the claimant did not sufficiently comply with the direction of 6 February 2025 requiring clarification of which of proposals a-d were being pursued as legal claims, and no reply was received to the further opportunity given on 18 March 2025. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The tribunal struck out the complaint after the claimant did not sufficiently comply with the direction of 6 February 2025 requiring clarification of which of proposals a-d were being pursued as legal claims, and no reply was received to the further opportunity given on 18 March 2025. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.