Case 1402473/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Rostance v Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402473/2022
- Decision date
- 2 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge David Hughes
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J Rostance
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant appeared in person. The 1st Respondent was represented by a lay representative, and the 2nd Respondent did not appear and was not represented.
The judgment states that the claimant's claim against the 1st Respondent was not well-founded. It also states that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction because the claimant was not an employee of the 2nd Respondent. No monetary award was made in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the specific heads of claim. It records that the claimant's claim against the 1st Respondent was not well-founded and that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction because the claimant was not an employee of the 2nd Respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.