Case 1402474/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Kersley v Phoenix Joinery Hampshire Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402474/2020
- Decision date
- 9 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Kersley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21. It found that Mr P Kersley was made redundant on 6 April 2020. At termination he had 9 complete years of service and was aged 65. For redundancy purposes, his weekly wage was capped at £583.00, and the tribunal held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,263.00.
The tribunal also found that the respondent owed Mr Kersley money on termination for wages and holiday pay. It awarded £2,396.44 net for wages for March 2020, £444.75 net for wages for April 2020, and £1,037.75 for holiday pay. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the total sum of £11,141.94.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was made redundant on 6 April 2020 and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,263.00, calculated by reference to 9 complete years of service and a weekly wage capped at £583.00. | Upheld | — | £7,263 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment awards unpaid wages on termination for March 2020 (£2,396.44 net) and April 2020 (£444.75 net), which together total £2,841.19. | Upheld | — | £2,841 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment separately awards holiday pay on termination of £1,037.75. | Upheld | — | £1,038 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,142
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.