Case 1402480/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Tremlett v French Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402480/2021
- Decision date
- 15 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Youngs Representation
- Venue
- CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Tremlett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, Miss K Tremlett, brought a claim against French Limited heard by Employment Judge Youngs at a CVP hearing on 26 November 2021. The Tribunal first dealt with a claim for unlawful deduction from wages relating to holiday pay for leave taken in November 2020 and January 2021. It held that the claim was out of time, that it had been reasonably practicable for the Claimant to bring it in time, and that the Tribunal therefore did not have jurisdiction to determine it.
The Tribunal also considered the Claimant's holiday pay argument based on carry-over of annual leave. It found that she was not entitled to carry over annual leave from the 2020/2021 leave year into the 2021/2022 leave year under Regulation 13(10) of the Working Time Regulations. On that basis, the holiday pay claim failed and was dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for holiday pay for leave taken in November 2020 and January 2021 was found to be out of time; the Tribunal held it was reasonably practicable for the Claimant to bring it in time and therefore said it had no jurisdiction to determine the claim. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The Tribunal held the Claimant was not entitled to carry over annual leave from the 2020/2021 leave year into the 2021/2022 leave year under Regulation 13(10) of the Working Time Regulations, so the holiday pay claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Regulation 13(10) Working Time Regulations
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.