Case 1402497/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Talbot v Par Market Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402497/2022
- Decision date
- 28 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Halliday Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Talbot
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote hearing at Bristol on 14 March 2023 before Employment Judge Halliday, the tribunal dealt with two discrimination claims brought by Ms J Talbot against Par Market Limited. The age discrimination claim was struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospects of success.
The tribunal refused the respondent's application to strike out the sex discrimination claim. That claim was therefore allowed to proceed, subject to payment of the deposit specified in the deposit order dated 17 March 2023. The judgment is a procedural ruling only and records no merits findings or compensation award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The tribunal struck out the age discrimination claim as having no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | The respondent's application to strike out the sex discrimination claim was refused; the claim could proceed subject to payment of the deposit specified in the deposit order dated 17 March 2023. | Other | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- no reasonable prospects of success
- strike out
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.