Case 1402501/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Ward v Revel export Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402501/2019
- Decision date
- 16 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mulvaney Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Ward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S Ward’s claim was presented outside the statutory time limit, but Employment Judge Mulvaney found it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to have been submitted in time. On that basis, the tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to hear the claim.
The tribunal then found that the claimant was entitled to redundancy pay in the sum of £6,312.75. The respondent had already paid £500 to the claimant, so the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the balance of £5,812.75.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claim was presented outside the statutory time limit, but the tribunal was satisfied it was not reasonably practicable for it to have been submitted in time. The tribunal found the claimant entitled to redundancy pay of £6,312.75; £500 had already been paid, so the respondent was ordered to pay the balance of £5,812.75. | Upheld | — | £6,313 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,813
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- not reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.