Case 1402506/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Jones of Counsel For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402506/2021
- Decision date
- 7 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms R Hewitt-Gray, Mr I Ley
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss T Jones of Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 18 January 2023, Employment Judge N J Roper, sitting with Ms R Hewitt-Gray and Mr I Ley, recorded a judgment by consent in Miss D Ireland-Cooper v Bradleys Estate Agents Limited. The parties had agreed terms of settlement, and the tribunal adjourned the case so those terms could be implemented.
The judgment states that if neither party applied to re-list the matter for hearing before 31 January 2023, the case would stand dismissed as at that date. The document records no substantive findings on the merits of the unfair dismissal or disability discrimination issues and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a consent order and does not adjudicate the merits of any individual claim. It records that terms of settlement had been agreed and that the case was adjourned to allow implementation, with a provision that the case would stand dismissed if not relisted by 31 January 2023. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.